Gray v. M. A. Disbrow & Co.

55 N.W. 255, 36 Neb. 857, 1893 Neb. LEXIS 143
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 1893·No. No. 4912·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Ragan, C.

The decree which is sought to be reviewed in this case was rendered in the court below on the 14th of January, 1891, and a transcript of the evidence and the proceedings of the court below was filed in this court August 21,1891. More than six months having elapsed between the date of [858]*858the rendition of said decree and the filing in this court of the transcript of the proceedings and evidence, this case cannot be tried here as an appeal. It appears also, from looking into the record, that no motion for a new trial was filed in the court below. We are, therefore, precluded from examining the testimony to see if the decree is supported by the evidence. (Carlow v. Aultman, 28 Neb., 672.) The judgment of the district court is therefore in all things

Affirmed.

The other commissioners concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. M. A. Disbrow & Co., 55 N.W. 255, 36 Neb. 857, 1893 Neb. LEXIS 143 (Neb. 1893).

55 N.W. 255 (Gray v. M. A. Disbrow & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Albers v. City of Omaha
76 N.W. 911 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Davis
60 N.W. 321 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Scroggin v. National Lumber Co.
59 N.W. 548 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)
Zehr v. Miller
59 N.W. 384 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)