Gray v. EMC Mortgage

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1747

JEFFREY K. GRAY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

EMC MORTGAGE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-02768-AW)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey K. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Nathan Heyer, THOMPSON & HINE, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gray’s informal

brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s

disposition, Gray has forfeited appellate review of the court’s

order. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Gray’s motion to

appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED