Gray v. EMC Mortgage

Fourth Circuit

Gray v. EMC Mortgage

396 F. App'x 960

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2010·No. No. 10-1747·Published

Opinion

[961]*961Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gray’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gray has forfeited review of the court’s order. we affirm. We deny Gray’s to appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[961]*961Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gray’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gray has forfeited review of the court’s order. we affirm. We deny Gray’s to appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gray v. EMC Mortgage, 396 F. App'x 960 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

396 F. App'x 960 (Gray v. EMC Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.