Gray v. Cook Incorporated
This text of Gray v. Cook Incorporated (Gray v. Cook Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A CERTIFIED TRUE COPY <",, FI L E D Roger A.G. Sharpe, Clerk © Xs U.S. DISTRICT COURT US PIE GOUT indiana EY || © UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL | EASTERN DISTRICT ARKANSA ee on May 19, 2022 By (Ywsnton walnd MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ee Deputy Clerk Tammy H. Downs, Clerk By: Jake Kornegay D.C. DEP CL IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC., [VC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2570
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —204)
On October 15, 2014, the Panel transferred 13 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 53 F.Supp.3d 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2014). Since that time, 788 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Southern District of Indiana. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Richard L. Young. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of Indiana and assigned to Judge Young. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Southern District of Indiana for the reasons stated in the order of October 15, 2014, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Richard L. Young. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL: pening attire, he ° é LA BAA May 19, 2022 ce iniTeD SraTeS John W. Nichols MUCTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: COOK MEDICAL, INC., IVC FILTERS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2570 SCHEDULE CTO−204 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION ARIZONA 1:22-cv-6798-RLY-TAB AZ 2 22−00701 Levy v. Cook Incorporated et al AZ 3 22−08073 Moore v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6799-RLY-TAB ARKANSAS EASTERN ARE 3 22−00112 Gray v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6800-RLY-TAB MARYLAND MD 8 22−01016 Shubrooks v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6801-RLY-TAB MINNESOTA MN 0 22−01258 Kinde v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6802-RLY-TAB MONTANA MT 1 22−00040 Monin v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6803-RLY-TAB MT 1 22−00041 Propp v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6804-RLY-TAB NEW MEXICO NM 2 22−00314 Moreno v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6805-RLY-TAB SOUTH CAROLINA SC 1 22−01447 Oleson v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6806-RLY-TAB SC 4 22−01423 Rogers v. Cook Incorporated et al 1:22-cv-6807-RLY-TAB
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gray v. Cook Incorporated, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-cook-incorporated-ared-2022.