Graves v. . Pritchett

177 S.E. 641, 207 N.C. 518
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 1, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.E. 641 (Graves v. . Pritchett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. . Pritchett, 177 S.E. 641, 207 N.C. 518 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Civil action by administratrix of surviving partner for partnership accounting and for alleged fraudulent misapplication of partnership assets.

There was a motion to dismiss the action for laches, or because barred by the statute of limitations, which was overruled. Exception. *Page 519

A compulsory reference was ordered, to which both sides excepted, and the defendants appeal. The refusal to dismiss the action will not be disturbed on appeal(Griffin v. Bank, 205 N.C. 253, 171 S.E. 71), but there was error in ordering a compulsory reference without first disposing of the pleas in bar. C. S., 573; Garland v. Arrowood, 172 N.C. 591, 90 S.E. 766; Jonesv. Wooten, 137 N.C. 421, 49 S.E. 915; Royster v. Wright, 118 N.C. 152,24 S.E. 746. Error in this respect is confessed by appellee.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. Bank of Coleridge
171 S.E. 71 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Royster v. . Wright
24 S.E. 746 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1896)
Garland v. . Arrowood
90 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)
Jones v. Wooten.
49 S.E. 915 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 S.E. 641, 207 N.C. 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-pritchett-nc-1935.