Graves v. Pritchett

177 S.E. 641, 207 N.C. 518, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 192
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 1, 1935·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.

The refusal to dismiss the action will not be disturbed on appeal (Griffin v. Bank, 205 N. C., 253, 171 S. E., 71), but there was error in ordering a compulsory reference without first disposing of the pleas in bar. C. S., 573; Garland v. Arrowood, 172 N. C., 591, 90 S. E., 766; Jones v. Wooten, 137 N. C., 421, 49 S. E., 915; Royster v. Wright, 118 N. C., 152, 24 S. E., 746. Error in this respect is confessed by appellee.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graves v. Pritchett, 177 S.E. 641, 207 N.C. 518, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 192 (N.C. 1935).

177 S.E. 641 (Graves v. Pritchett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc. v. Scott
132 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Alston v. Robertson
63 S.E.2d 632 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Grady v. Parker
52 S.E.2d 273 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Finance Corp. v. . Lane
19 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Manufacturers & Jobbers Finance Corp. v. Lane
19 S.E.2d 849 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.
6 S.E.2d 842 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Ward v. . Sewell
199 S.E. 28 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)