Alston v. Robertson

63 S.E.2d 632, 233 N.C. 309, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 584
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 7, 1951·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DeNny, J.

It appears on the face of the record that a compulsory reference was ordered without first disposing of the pleas in bar. This was error and the appellees so concede. Grady v. Parker, 230 N.C. 166, 52 S.E. 2d 273; Ward v. Sewell, 214 N.C. 279, 199 S.E. 28; Graves v. Pritchett, 207 N.C. 518, 177 S.E. 641; McIntosh N. C. Prac. and Proc., section 523, p. 564.

Furthermore, the issues involved and the relief sought in this action, do not appear to be such as to justify or support an order of reference pursuant to the provisions of the statute, G.S. 1-189.

[310] The order of reference will be vacated and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings in accord with the rights of the respective parties.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alston v. Robertson, 63 S.E.2d 632, 233 N.C. 309, 1951 N.C. LEXIS 584 (N.C. 1951).

63 S.E.2d 632 (Alston v. Robertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coin Machine Acceptance Corp. v. Pillman
69 S.E.2d 563 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)