Graves v. DJO, LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided June 28, 2022·No. 3:20-cv-01103·Unknown

Opinion

MARIE GRAVES, Case No.: 20cv1103-W(KSC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT v. MOTION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SETTLEMENT DJO, LLC, a Delaware limited liability CONFERENCE [Doc. No. 38]; company,

NOTICE AND ORDER MODIFYING Defendant. MANDATORY SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE TO BE HELD VIA ZOOM AND ISSUING UPDATED PROCEDURES

Good cause appearing, the parties Joint Motion to Continue the Mandatory Settlement Conference is GRANTED. [Doc. No. 38.] The Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) has been re-scheduled for August 31, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford. Although the Court typically requires personal attendance of all participants, due to the COVID-19 public emergency the MSC will be held by video conference. If circumstances relating to the COVID-19 public emergency improve before the date of the MSC, the Court will notify the parties that it will conduct the conference in person. The following are mandatory guidelines for the parties preparing for the MSC. Absent express permission obtained from this Court, and notwithstanding the pendency of any motion, counsel shall timely comply with the dates and deadlines herein. 1. Full Settlement Authority Is Required: Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.1.c.1, all parties, party representatives (including claims adjusters for insured parties), and the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must participate in the MSC.1 This appearance must be made with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement.2 In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the corporation who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of the plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damage prayers). The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. Counsel for a government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as the government attorney who participates in the MSC (1) has primary responsibility for handling the case; and (2) may negotiate settlement offers that the attorney is willing to recommend to the government official having ultimate settlement authority. 1 The attendance requirement includes parties that are indemnified by others. Any deviation from this Order requires prior Court approval. 2 Full authority to settle means that the individuals attending the MSC are authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-486 (D. Ariz. 2003). One of the purposes of requiring a person with unlimited settlement authority to attend the conference is that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the face-to-face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-597 (8th Cir. 2001). 2. Procedure for Zoom Videoconference Appearance: The Court will use its Zoom video conferencing account to host the MSC. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.3 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom, and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the MSC.4 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account. Before the start of the MSC, the Court will email each participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Participants shall join the video conference by following the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink in the invitation. Participants who do not have Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the ZoomGov Meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and install Zoom before proceeding. Zoom may then prompt participants to enter the password included in the invitation. All participants will be placed in a waiting room until the MSC begins. Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least five minutes before the start of the MSC to ensure that the conference begins on time. The Zoom e- mail invitation may indicate an earlier start time, but the MSC will begin at the time scheduled by the Court. Zoom’s functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the MSC as it ordinarily would conduct an in-person one. The Court will divide participants into separate, 3 Participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers for the video conference, if possible, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graves v. DJO, LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Graves v. DJO, LLC (Graves v. DJO, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related