Gratz v. Bollinger

277 F.3d 803, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 29305, 2001 WL 1707038
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2001
DocketNo. 01-1333, 01-1416, 01-1418, 01-1438, 01-1516
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 F.3d 803 (Gratz v. Bollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gratz v. Bollinger, 277 F.3d 803, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 29305, 2001 WL 1707038 (6th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals filed a petition seeking initial en banc review of the decisions of the two district courts before whom the cases were heard. The petition was referred to the three-judge panel to which the appeals had been assigned for oral argument on October 23, 2001.

The panel requested that all of the active judges of the court be polled to determine whether or not the petition should be granted and the appeals be presented in the first instance to the en banc court for argument and decision. A majority of the active judges voted to grant the petition; therefore

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for initial hearing en banc be, and it hereby is, GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED the oral argument scheduled for October 23, 2001 is cancelled; oral argu[804]*804ment to the en banc court will be on Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 1:30 P.M., EST, in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ebony Patterson v. Lee Bollinger
277 F.3d 803 (Sixth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 F.3d 803, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 29305, 2001 WL 1707038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gratz-v-bollinger-ca6-2001.