Ebony Patterson v. Lee Bollinger

277 F.3d 803
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2001
Docket01-1333
StatusPublished

This text of 277 F.3d 803 (Ebony Patterson v. Lee Bollinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ebony Patterson v. Lee Bollinger, 277 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

277 F.3d 803 (6th Cir. 2001)

JENNIFER GRATZ AND PATRICK HAMACHER FOR THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellants (01-1333 and 01-1418), Plaintiffs-Appellees (01-1416),
v.

LEE BOLLINGER, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees (01-1333 and 01-1418), Defendants-Appellants (01-1416),

EBONY PATTERSON, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees (01-1333), Intervening Defendants (01-1416), Intervening Defendants-Appellees (01-1418), Intervening Defendants-Appellants (01-1438)
BARBARA GRUTTER, Plaintiff-Appellee (01-1447 and 01-1516),
v.
LEE BOLLINGER. ET AL., Defendants-Appellants (01-1447),
and
KIMBERLY JAMES, ET AL., Intervening Defendants-Appellants (01-1516).

Nos. 01-1333, 01-1416, 01-1418, 01-1438, 01-1516

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

October 19, 2001

Before: MARTIN, Chief Circuit Judge; BOGGS, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

Prior Report: 247 F.3d 631

ORDER

The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals filed a petition seeking initial en banc review of the decisions of the two district courts before whom the cases were heard. The petition was referred to the three-judge panel to which the appeals had been assigned for oral argument on October 23, 2001.

The panel requested that all of the active judges of the court be polled to determine whether or not the petition should be granted and the appeals be presented in the first instance to the en banc court for argument and decision. A majority of the active judges voted to grant the petition; therefore

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for initial hearing en banc be, and it hereby is, GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED the oral argument scheduled for October 23, 2001 is cancelled; oral argument to the en banc court will be on Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 1:30 P.M., EST, in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 F.3d 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ebony-patterson-v-lee-bollinger-ca6-2001.