Grantham v. State

11 S.E. 140, 84 Ga. 559

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 1, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, J.

There was sufficient evidence in this case to warrant the verdict of the iury. Judgment affirmed.

Hinton & Cutts, by brief, for plaintiff in error. C. B. Hudson, solicitor-general, for the State.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grantham v. State, 11 S.E. 140, 84 Ga. 559 (Ga. 1890).

Pincite

11 S.E. 140 (Grantham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.