Grantham v. State

14 S.E. 892, 89 Ga. 121
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 26, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 14 S.E. 892 (Grantham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grantham v. State, 14 S.E. 892, 89 Ga. 121 (Ga. 1892).

Opinion

[121]*121 Judgment reversed..

Martin & Smith, for plaintiff in error. Tom Eason, solicitor-general, by Hines, Shubriok & Eelber, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
537 S.E.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Isom v. State
32 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Barbour v. State
94 S.E. 272 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Haley v. State
52 S.E. 159 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hubbard v. State
51 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Henderson v. State
39 S.E. 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Eaves v. State
39 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Brand v. State
37 S.E. 100 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.E. 892, 89 Ga. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-v-state-ga-1892.