Grantham v. State

14 S.E. 892, 89 Ga. 121
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 26, 1892·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[121] Judgment reversed..

Martin & Smith, for plaintiff in error. Tom Eason, solicitor-general, by Hines, Shubriok & Eelber, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grantham v. State, 14 S.E. 892, 89 Ga. 121 (Ga. 1892).

14 S.E. 892 (Grantham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
537 S.E.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Isom v. State
32 S.E.2d 437 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Barbour v. State
94 S.E. 272 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Haley v. State
52 S.E. 159 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Hubbard v. State
51 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Henderson v. State
39 S.E. 446 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Eaves v. State
39 S.E. 318 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Brand v. State
37 S.E. 100 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)