Grantham v. Lance
This text of 79 S.E. 481 (Grantham v. Lance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where personal property has been left by the owner with an agent, to be kept by the latter until called for, and the agent refuses to deliver it on demand, a possessory warrant will lie for its recovery, Meredith v. Knott, 34 Ga. 222; Sheriff v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 436 (42 S. E. 738); Allen v. Wheeler, 121 Ga. 277 (48 S. E. 923). In such a [556]*556ease the general rule that the possession must have been acquired eithei violently or fraudulently does not apply.
2. Under the evidence it did not appear that the defendant in the possessory warrant had been in peaceable possession of the property in question, in his own right, for four years prior to the suing out of the warrant; and the dismissal of the warrant would not have been authorized upon thi theory that the defendant’s possession must be presumed to be lawful. It appeared without dispute, from the allegations of the petition for eeu tiorari, that it had not been as much as two years since the plaintiff in the possessory warrant had the right to demand the return of thi deed. New v. LeHardy, 46 Ga. 616; McLeod v. Bozeman, 26 Ga. 177.
3. The court erred in refusing to sanction the certiorari.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 481, 13 Ga. App. 555, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-v-lance-gactapp-1913.