Allen v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Allen v. Wheeler

48 S.E. 923, 121 Ga. 277, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 107

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 12, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 48 S.E. 923 (Allen v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Allen v. Wheeler, 48 S.E. 923, 121 Ga. 277, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 107 (Ga. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Candler, J.

On the trial' before the magistrate there was evidence warranting a finding that, the property in dispute was left by the plaintiff with the defendant as her agent, to be kept until called for; and that it was not deposited as collateral security for a debt. Accordingly, following the decisions of this court in Meredith v. Knott, 34 Ga. 222, and Sheriff v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 436, it is held that the plaintiff may recover the property by a possessory warrant. This being the only question argued in the brief of coun[278]*278sel for tlie plaintiff in error, the judgment of the superior court overruling the certiorari is . Affirmed.

Submitted October 22, — Decided November 12, 1904.

■ Certiorari. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. May 30, 1904,

M. Felton Hatcher, for plaintiff in error. Herman Brasch, contra. All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Candler, J.

On the trial' before the magistrate there was evidence warranting a finding that, the property in dispute was left by the plaintiff with the defendant as her agent, to be kept until called for; and that it was not deposited as collateral security for a debt. Accordingly, following the decisions of this court in Meredith v. Knott, 34 Ga. 222, and Sheriff v. Thompson, 116 Ga. 436, it is held that the plaintiff may recover the property by a possessory warrant. This being the only question argued in the brief of coun[278]*278sel for tlie plaintiff in error, the judgment of the superior court overruling the certiorari is . Affirmed.

Submitted October 22, — Decided November 12, 1904.

■ Certiorari. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. May 30, 1904,

M. Felton Hatcher, for plaintiff in error. Herman Brasch, contra. All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 S.E. 923, 121 Ga. 277, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/allen-v-wheeler-ga-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack