Grant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Grant v. State

110 S.E. 415, 27 Ga. App. 623, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 314

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 17, 1921

Docket12721

StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 415 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. State, 110 S.E. 415, 27 Ga. App. 623, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 314 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The evidence relied upon by the State to connect the accused with the offense of the larceny of a hog is wholly circumstantial, and does not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Conviction oil larceny of hog; from Wilcox superior court — Judge Gower. July 5, 1921.

Hal Lawson, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, Grantham, & Kassewitz, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI