Grant v. State
100 S.E. 757, 24 Ga. App. 346, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 19 Ga. App. 229 →
Opinion
1. “The overruling of a demurrer to an indictment can not properly be made a ground of a motion for a new trial.” Veal v. State, 116 Ga. 589 (42 S. E. 705) ; Brown v. Wilkes, 20 Ga. App. 92 (92 S. E. 553), and cases cited.
2. Under*tlie qualifying note of the trial judge there is no merit in the fifth ground of the motion for a new trial.
3. The court did not err in charging the jury on voluntary manslaughter.
4. The evidence suqiports the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 100 S.E. 757, 24 Ga. App. 346, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
100 S.E. 757 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Veal v. State
42 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Brown v. Wilkes
92 S.E. 553 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)