Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Grant v. State

Grant v. State

100 S.E. 757, 24 Ga. App. 346, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 4, 1919
Docket10810
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 757 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant v. State, 100 S.E. 757, 24 Ga. App. 346, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “The overruling of a demurrer to an indictment can not properly be made a ground of a motion for a new trial.” Veal v. State, 116 Ga. 589 (42 S. E. 705) ; Brown v. Wilkes, 20 Ga. App. 92 (92 S. E. 553), and cases cited.

2. Under*tlie qualifying note of the trial judge there is no merit in the fifth ground of the motion for a new trial.

3. The court did not err in charging the jury on voluntary manslaughter.

4. The evidence suqiports the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Veal v. State
42 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Brown v. Wilkes
92 S.E. 553 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 757, 24 Ga. App. 346, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-gactapp-1919.