Grant v. State

125 So. 3d 879, 2013 WL 1748475, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6564
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12906
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 24, 2013·No. No. 4D12-4341·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tukes v. State, 115 So.3d 1014 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (citing Parks v. State, 101 So.3d 1265, 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), and Jackman v. State, 88 So.3d 325, 327 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)); see also Medina v. State, 690 So.2d 1241, 1249 (Fla.1997) (constitutionality of statute improper subject of Rule 3.850 motion).

Based on appellant’s history of litigating legally frivolous post-conviction claims in this court, the clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for disciplinary proceedings. § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2012); Sears v. State, 123 So.3d 1160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Appellant is cautioned that any further frivolous or malicious filings will result in this court imposing the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47, 48-49 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, GROSS and GERBER,'JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. State, 125 So. 3d 879, 2013 WL 1748475, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6564 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

125 So. 3d 879 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medina v. State
690 So. 2d 1241 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
State v. Spencer
751 So. 2d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Parks v. State
101 So. 3d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Tukes v. State
115 So. 3d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Sears v. State
123 So. 3d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Jackman v. State
88 So. 3d 325 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)