Sears v. State

123 So. 3d 1160, 2013 WL 692432, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3191
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2013
DocketNo. 4D11-4066
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 123 So. 3d 1160 (Sears v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sears v. State, 123 So. 3d 1160, 2013 WL 692432, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3191 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(a)(Z); Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236, 1241 (Fla.2004). Appellant’s claim that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the probable cause affidavit allegedly lacked an official seal is frivolous. Collins v. State, 97 So.3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Parks v. State, 101 So.3d 1265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Logan v. State, 1 So.3d 1253 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

The clerk is directed to send a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for disciplinary proceedings. § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Appellant is cautioned that any further frivolous or malicious filing may result in this court imposing the sanction of no longer accepting his pro se filings. State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

WARNER, GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Golfe v. State
125 So. 3d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Grant v. State
125 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 3d 1160, 2013 WL 692432, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sears-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.