Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Grant v. State

Grant v. State

875 So. 2d 795, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8932, 2004 WL 1414035
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 854 So. 2d 240 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 2004·No. No. 5D04-1628·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is facially insufficient because it was not made under oath. Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)(F). Therefore, the petition is denied without prejudice for the petitioner to refile a proper sworn petition. Riley v. State, 866 So.2d 779 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Ezell v. State, 778 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Harris v. State, 769 So.2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

PETITION DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SAWAYA, C.J., SHARP, W., and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. State, 875 So. 2d 795, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8932, 2004 WL 1414035 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

875 So. 2d 795 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Riley v. State
866 So. 2d 779 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Ezell v. State
778 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Harris v. State
769 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)