Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ezell v. State

Ezell v. State

778 So. 2d 1071, 2001 WL 201961
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 2001·No. 5D01-171·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

778 So.2d 1071 (2001)

Gregory L. EZELL, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 5D01-171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 2, 2001.

Gregory L. Ezell, Crawfordville, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The pro se petition for belated appeal is facially insufficient because it was not made under oath. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(3)(F). Therefore, the petition is denied without prejudice for the petitioner to refile a proper sworn petition. See Harris v. State, 769 So.2d 529 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 746 So.2d 544 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

COBB, GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ezell v. State, 778 So. 2d 1071, 2001 WL 201961 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

778 So. 2d 1071 (Ezell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
915 So. 2d 782 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cosby v. State
911 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
McKnight v. State
896 So. 2d 973 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Fuller v. State
886 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Grant v. State
875 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Riley v. State
861 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Lane v. Gardner
778 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)