Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Grant v. Oakey

Grant v. Oakey

130 S.E.2d 490, 218 Ga. 723, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 308
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 12, 1963·No. 21991·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

The case under review is a condemnation action where after the condemnor had paid the amount into court, the parties here filed their respective, claims to the proceeds. After a hearing before the court, without a jury, the proceeds were awarded to the defendants in error. The *724 sole question before the trial court and now under review was and is: Who was entitled to the proceeds of the award? The Court of Appeals and not this court has jurisdiction to review the judgment. See Boswell v. Underwood, 217 Ga. 675 (124 SE2d 394).

Submitted March 12, 1963 Decided March 12, 1963. Frank D. Schaffer, for plaintiff in error. T. Blake Jackson, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Oakey, 130 S.E.2d 490, 218 Ga. 723, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 308 (Ga. 1963).

130 S.E.2d 490 (Grant v. Oakey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flournoy v. Olshan
242 S.E.2d 99 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978)
DeKalb County v. JACKSON-ATLANTIC COMPANY
177 S.E.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
Acree Oil Co. v. State Highway Department
175 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Waddell v. City of Atlanta
172 S.E.2d 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
Graham v. Haley
162 S.E.2d 346 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
State Highway Department v. Holleman
137 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Alexander v. Rozetta
135 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Richardson v. Anderson
133 S.E.2d 16 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Howard v. Pate
130 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)