Flournoy v. Olshan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Flournoy v. Olshan

242 S.E.2d 99, 240 Ga. 590, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 719

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 1978

Docket32984

StatusPublished

This text of 242 S.E.2d 99 (Flournoy v. Olshan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flournoy v. Olshan, 242 S.E.2d 99, 240 Ga. 590, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 719 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

The Department of Transportation brought a proceeding in rem in Muscogee Superior Court to condemn a tract of land of approximately 64 acres. An order was entered decreeing title to the property in the condemnor, and the estimated compensation was deposited in the registry of the court. The condemnor appealed from a judgment in the case which, inter alia, ordered separate appraisals, separate deposits of estimated compensation for each parcel, and separate trials as to each parcel. This court reversed those provisions of the judgment. Dept. of Transportation v. Olshan, 237 Ga. 213 (227 SE2d 349) (1976). The present appeal is from a judgment apportioning the proceeds of the condemnation award among the condemnees, who are holders of first-lien and second-lien security deeds on the various parcels contained within the boundaries of the 64-acre tract. Held:

The appellants assert in their notice of appeal that jurisdiction is in this court for the reason that the case involves the condemnation of realty and title to land. "This court has repeatedly held that where title to land has been decreed in the condemnor, incidental questions determining the rights of parties to receive the award of condemnation money, not directly involving the title to land, do not give this court jurisdiction of a condemnation [591]*591case. See Wilson v. State Hwy. Dept., 208 Ga. 510 (67 SE2d 578) [1951]; Boswell v. Underwood, 217 Ga. 675 (124 SE2d 394) [1962]; Grant v. Oakey, 218 Ga. 723 (130 SE2d 490) [1963]; Howard v. Pate, 218 Ga. 741 (130 SE2d 752) [1963]; Richardson v. Anderson, 219 Ga. 264 (133 SE2d 16) [1963]; State Hwy. Dept. v. Holleman, 220 Ga. 72 (137 SE2d 39) [1964], The jurisdiction of the present case is in the Court of Appeals, andnotthis court .”DeKalb County v. Jackson-Atlantic Co., 226 Ga. 664 (177 SE2d 90) (1970).

Argued November 17, 1977 Decided January 24, 1978. Ron S. Iddins, for appellants. Champion & Champion, Forrest L. Champion, for appellees.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, Hall and Bowles, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marshall, Justice.

The Department of Transportation brought a proceeding in rem in Muscogee Superior Court to condemn a tract of land of approximately 64 acres. An order was entered decreeing title to the property in the condemnor, and the estimated compensation was deposited in the registry of the court. The condemnor appealed from a judgment in the case which, inter alia, ordered separate appraisals, separate deposits of estimated compensation for each parcel, and separate trials as to each parcel. This court reversed those provisions of the judgment. Dept. of Transportation v. Olshan, 237 Ga. 213 (227 SE2d 349) (1976). The present appeal is from a judgment apportioning the proceeds of the condemnation award among the condemnees, who are holders of first-lien and second-lien security deeds on the various parcels contained within the boundaries of the 64-acre tract. Held:

The appellants assert in their notice of appeal that jurisdiction is in this court for the reason that the case involves the condemnation of realty and title to land. "This court has repeatedly held that where title to land has been decreed in the condemnor, incidental questions determining the rights of parties to receive the award of condemnation money, not directly involving the title to land, do not give this court jurisdiction of a condemnation [591]*591case. See Wilson v. State Hwy. Dept., 208 Ga. 510 (67 SE2d 578) [1951]; Boswell v. Underwood, 217 Ga. 675 (124 SE2d 394) [1962]; Grant v. Oakey, 218 Ga. 723 (130 SE2d 490) [1963]; Howard v. Pate, 218 Ga. 741 (130 SE2d 752) [1963]; Richardson v. Anderson, 219 Ga. 264 (133 SE2d 16) [1963]; State Hwy. Dept. v. Holleman, 220 Ga. 72 (137 SE2d 39) [1964], The jurisdiction of the present case is in the Court of Appeals, andnotthis court .”DeKalb County v. Jackson-Atlantic Co., 226 Ga. 664 (177 SE2d 90) (1970).

Argued November 17, 1977 Decided January 24, 1978. Ron S. Iddins, for appellants. Champion & Champion, Forrest L. Champion, for appellees.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Jordan, Hall and Bowles, JJ., who dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 S.E.2d 99, 240 Ga. 590, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flournoy-v-olshan-ga-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack