Grant v. City of Long Beach

334 F.3d 795, 2002 WL 32123847
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 27, 2003·No. No. 01-56046·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed December 16, 2002, appearing at 315 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2002) is amended as follows:

At 315 F.3d at 1090, delete the last sentence in the second full paragraph which reads “Therefore, the district court properly submitted the issue of qualified immunity to the jury and entered judgment upon its verdict.”

With the opinion thus amended, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Tashima voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judges Bright and Goodwin recommended denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. City of Long Beach, 334 F.3d 795, 2002 WL 32123847 (9th Cir. 2003).

334 F.3d 795 (Grant v. City of Long Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc
696 F.3d 872 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Ewing v. City of Stockton
588 F.3d 1218 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Grant v. City of Long Beach
334 F.3d 795 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)