Grandy v. . Gulley
This text of 26 S.E. 779 (Grandy v. . Gulley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This controversy was submitted without action, under The Gode, Sec. 567, upon an agreed state of facts. We cannot enter into the merits of the controversy, for the reason that the affidavit required by the Statute was not made or does not appear in the record. This mode of proceeding is unknown to the common law, and unless, the positive requirement of the Statute is observed the court is without jurisdiction.
It must appear by affidavit that the court would have jurisdiction if the proceeding was by summons; also that the controversy is real and the proceeding is in good faith. Jones v. Commissioners, 88 N. C., 56; Arnold v. Porter, 119 N. C., 123.
In Bank v. Loan & Trust Co., 119 N. C., 553, on motion, the defendant being present in this court and not objecting, the plaintiff was allowed to file the required affidavit, and the court proceeded to hear the case.
Proceeding Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.E. 779, 120 N.C. 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grandy-v-gulley-nc-1897.