Grandy v. . Gulley

26 S.E. 779, 120 N.C. 176
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1897·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Fairoloth, C. J.:

This controversy was submitted without action, under The Gode, Sec. 567, upon an agreed state of facts. We cannot enter into the merits of the controversy, for the reason that the affidavit required by the Statute was not made or does not appear in the record. This mode of proceeding is unknown to the common law, and unless, the positive requirement of the Statute is observed the court is without jurisdiction.

It must appear by affidavit that the court would have jurisdiction if the proceeding was by summons; also that the controversy is real and the proceeding is in good faith. Jones v. Commissioners, 88 N. C., 56; Arnold v. Porter, 119 N. C., 123.

In Bank v. Loan & Trust Co., 119 N. C., 553, on motion, the defendant being present in this court and not objecting, the plaintiff was allowed to file the required affidavit, and the court proceeded to hear the case.

Proceeding Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grandy v. . Gulley, 26 S.E. 779, 120 N.C. 176 (N.C. 1897).

26 S.E. 779 (Grandy v. . Gulley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

PENLAND v. United States
Federal Claims, 2026
City of Charlotte v. BMJ OF CHARLOTTE, LLC
675 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Smith
611 S.E.2d 427 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Love v. United States
889 F. Supp. 1548 (E.D. North Carolina, 1994)
Keziah v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company
158 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
R. R. v. . Manufacturing Co.
51 S.E.2d 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Carolina & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Piedmont Wagon & Manufacturing Co.
229 N.C. 695 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
County of Todd v. County of Morrison
234 N.W. 593 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1931)
Lipe v. . County of Stanly
156 S.E. 243 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Garris v. . Hardy
156 S.E. 245 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Pruitt v. . Wood
156 S.E. 126 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)
Finney v. . Corbett
136 S.E. 878 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Norfolk Southern R. v. Stricklin
264 F. 546 (E.D. North Carolina, 1920)