Arnold v. . Porter

25 S.E. 785, 119 N.C. 123
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1896·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

MONTGOMERY, J.:

It was intended, it seems, to submit without action a case containing facts upon which the controversy depends, under Section 567 of The Code. It *124 appears that the affidavit required by the statute, to the effect that the controversy is real and that the proceeding is in good faith to determine the rights of the parties, was never made or filed. Such an affidavit is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction in the matter. Jones v. Com missioners, 88 N. C., 56 ; Grant v. Newsom, 81 N. C., 86. The proceeding must be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arnold v. . Porter, 25 S.E. 785, 119 N.C. 123 (N.C. 1896).

25 S.E. 785 (Arnold v. . Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson Oil Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
52 P.2d 683 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1935)
Finney v. . Corbett
136 S.E. 878 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Waters v. . Boyd
102 S.E. 196 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Grandy v. . Gulley
26 S.E. 779 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1897)