Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company
This text of Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company (Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSE ANTONIO GRAJALES, Plaintiff, 23-CV-6972 (LTS) -against- ORDER ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On August 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint and paid the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this court by submitting a certified check. He also submitted five additional certified checks in the amounts of $.03, $.05, $.08, $.10, and $.25. Because Plaintiff has paid the full $402.00 in fees, the additional certified checks are unnecessary. The Court therefore directs the Clerk of Court to return to Plaintiff the five additional certified checks. CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to return to Plaintiff the five additional certified checks he submitted in the amounts of $.03, $.05, $.08, $.10, and $.25. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: August 18, 2023 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grajales-v-eli-lilly-and-company-nysd-2023.