Graham v. Woodhull

1 Cai. Cas. 496

Opinion

After some little conversation on the bench, in which it was conceived this practice might possibly lead to hunting for instances of perjury, the court granted the motion, on ^payment of costs, saying they could not [*498] make any distinction between actions of slander and other cases.

[1]

Motion granted.

See Lent v. Butler, 3 Cow. 370; Williams v. Cooper, 1 Hill, 637.