Graham v. Woodhull
1 Cai. Cas. 496
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 496 (Graham v. Woodhull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Graham v. Woodhull, 1 Cai. Cas. 496 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
[623]*623After some little conversation on the bench, in which it was conceived this practice might possibly lead to hunting for instances of perjury, the court granted the motion, on ^payment of costs, saying they could not [*498] make any distinction between actions of slander and other cases.
Motion granted.
See Lent v. Butler, 3 Cow. 370; Williams v. Cooper, 1 Hill, 637.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lent v. Butler
3 Cow. 370 (New York Supreme Court, 1824)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cai. Cas. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-woodhull-nysupct-1804.