Graham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Graham v. State

539 S.W.3d 90

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 30, 2018

DocketWD 80225

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 90 (Graham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graham v. State, 539 S.W.3d 90 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Ms. Llkeesha Graham appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Andrew County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Ms. Llkeesha Graham appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Andrew County, Missouri, denying, after an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graham-v-state-moctapp-2018.