Graham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Graham v. State

490 S.W.3d 777, 2016 WL 3068425, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 559

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 2016·No. WD 78934·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Adrian Graham appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Graham argues that the motion court erred in failing to grant him an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to investigate and call witnesses on Graham’s behalf at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Adrian Graham appeals the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Graham argues that the motion court erred in failing to grant him an evidentiary hearing on his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance in failing to investigate and call witnesses on Graham’s behalf at trial. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Graham v. State, 490 S.W.3d 777, 2016 WL 3068425, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 559 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

490 S.W.3d 777 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.