Graham v. State
475 So. 2d 264, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2756 →
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of manslaughter with a firearm pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty.
On appeal, appellant’s dispositive contention is that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an inquiry into the systematic exclusion of prospective black jurors by the prosecutor through the use of peremptory challenges, in violation of article I, section 16, Florida Constitution.
We agree with appellant’s contention and reverse and remand for a new trial. State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. State, 475 So. 2d 264, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1992, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15557 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
475 So. 2d 264 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Neil
457 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)