Graham v. State
421 So. 2d 194, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28151
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graham v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 406 So. 2d 503 →
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress upon a holding that the record affirmatively demonstrates that no exigent circumstances or recognized exception existed to justify the warrantless search and seizure in this case. See Martin v. State, 360 So.2d 396 (Fla. 1978). Our reversal makes it unnecessary to consider the other issue on appeal.
The conviction under review is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to discharge the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graham v. State, 421 So. 2d 194, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
421 So. 2d 194 (Graham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
360 So. 2d 396 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)