Graham v. Lomar Industries

583 So. 2d 819, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8400, 1991 WL 158569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 21, 1991·No. No. 89-3083·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of appellants and from an order on rehearing partially modifying said judgment.

The appellate record presented is entirely inadequate for this court to resolve the [820] issues presented. No transcript of the evidence adduced before the trial court is available as the proceedings were not recorded, nor is any stipulated statement pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 9.200(b)(3) provided. It is appellants’ burden to furnish the appellate court with a record adequate to support the appeal. Carter v. Carter, 504 So.2d 418 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); Bank of Virginia v. In re Estate of Ingraham, 564 So.2d 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Wright v. Wright, 431 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983). Under these circumstances, appellate relief cannot be afforded. Carter v. Carter, infra.

Accordingly, the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

DOWNEY and POLEN, JJ., and SHAHOOD, GEORGE A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graham v. Lomar Industries, 583 So. 2d 819, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8400, 1991 WL 158569 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

583 So. 2d 819 (Graham v. Lomar Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baez v. Padron
715 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)