Bank of Virginia v. Estate of Ingraham

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bank of Virginia v. Estate of Ingraham

564 So. 2d 627, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5730, 1990 WL 109479

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 1990

DocketNo. 89-02676

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 564 So. 2d 627 (Bank of Virginia v. Estate of Ingraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bank of Virginia v. Estate of Ingraham, 564 So. 2d 627, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5730, 1990 WL 109479 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bank of Virginia seeks review of the trial court’s order of discharge of personal representative in this action for a claim against the estate. Because this court was not provided with a transcript of the hearing below, the order discharging the personal representative is affirmed.

Appellant has the burden to demonstrate error. Where the hearing below was not reported by a court reporter and the appellant has not furnished the appellate court with a stipulated statement of facts, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed. Southeast Bank, N.A. v. David A. Steves, P.A., 552 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). See also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Hamm v. Ambassador Insurance Co., 456 So.2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bank of Virginia seeks review of the trial court’s order of discharge of personal representative in this action for a claim against the estate. Because this court was not provided with a transcript of the hearing below, the order discharging the personal representative is affirmed.

Appellant has the burden to demonstrate error. Where the hearing below was not reported by a court reporter and the appellant has not furnished the appellate court with a stipulated statement of facts, Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), a judgment which is not fundamentally erroneous on its face must be affirmed. Southeast Bank, N.A. v. David A. Steves, P.A., 552 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). See also Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1980); Hamm v. Ambassador Insurance Co., 456 So.2d 966 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

564 So. 2d 627, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5730, 1990 WL 109479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bank-of-virginia-v-estate-of-ingraham-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack