Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

800 A.2d 294, 569 Pa. 46, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1349

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 28, 2002

DocketPetition 65 WAL 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 800 A.2d 294 (Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 800 A.2d 294, 569 Pa. 46, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 1349 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, limited to the following issue.

Whether the Superior Court, en banc, correctly applied the law when it reversed the decision of the trial court to preclüde Dr. Charles S. Beroes’ expert testimony.

The parties are directed to address the effect of Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923), and Daubert v. *47 Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), on the analysis of this issue.

Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI