Grace v. Territory of Hawaii
This text of 13 Haw. 465 (Grace v. Territory of Hawaii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
This is a submission without action on the following agreed facts:
In February, 1901, a policeman at Hilo, Hawaii, without authority, justification or extenuation by law, shot and wounded a private citizen. It immediately became necessary to extract the bullet from the wounded man. The Sheriff of Hawaii requested the plaintiff, who was a licensed physician and surgeon practicing in Hilo-, to perform the operation, promising him reasonable compensation for the service by the department of' the Attorney-General. The plaintiff performed the service im a skillful manner and rendered a bill therefor to the said department. The question is whether the Territory is liable.
In our opinion the Sheriff was without authority to bind the-Territory to pay for an operation upon a private citizen made-[466]*466necessary by an unauthorized act of a policeman. Judgment for tbe defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 Haw. 465, 1901 Haw. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-v-territory-of-hawaii-haw-1901.