Grace v. Smith

Hawaii Supreme Court

Grace v. Smith

14 Haw. 144, 1902 Haw. LEXIS 10

CourtHawaii Supreme Court

DecidedApril 3, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 14 Haw. 144 (Grace v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grace v. Smith, 14 Haw. 144, 1902 Haw. LEXIS 10 (haw 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The only question for determination on this submission on agreed facts is whether the plaintiffs, physicians and surgeons* are entitled to priority of payment for professional services rendered the decedent during his last illness, that is, priority over ordinary creditors.

We have no statute on the subject. In the absence of statute, the expenses of the last illness have no priority. 2 Woemer, Administration, Secs. 361, 364, 365; 8 Am. & Eng. Ehc. of Law, 2nd Ed. 1031. In most of the states such expenses by statute rank next after the expenses of administration, funeral expenses, and debts: to the Hnited States, and before ordinary-debts. This seems to be just, but it is for the legislature, not the courts, to so provide. Hnder the law we must hold that the plaintiffs’ claim should be paid pro rata with other ordinary claims, the estate of the decedent being insufficient to pay them all in full.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, C.J.

The only question for determination on this submission on agreed facts is whether the plaintiffs, physicians and surgeons* are entitled to priority of payment for professional services rendered the decedent during his last illness, that is, priority over ordinary creditors.

We have no statute on the subject. In the absence of statute, the expenses of the last illness have no priority. 2 Woemer, Administration, Secs. 361, 364, 365; 8 Am. & Eng. Ehc. of Law, 2nd Ed. 1031. In most of the states such expenses by statute rank next after the expenses of administration, funeral expenses, and debts: to the Hnited States, and before ordinary-debts. This seems to be just, but it is for the legislature, not the courts, to so provide. Hnder the law we must hold that the plaintiffs’ claim should be paid pro rata with other ordinary claims, the estate of the decedent being insufficient to pay them all in full.

Judgment accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Haw. 144, 1902 Haw. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grace-v-smith-haw-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack