Grace O Marcaigh v. Christian Combs
Opinion
GRACE O’MARCAIGH, an individual, Case No. CV 25-3650-DMG (MAAx)
Plaintiff, ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION v. COURT AND TO MODIFY SCHEDULE [16] CHRISTIAN COMBS, an individual, SEAN COMBS, an individual, and JOHN and JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-10,
Defendants.
Having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to Proceed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California and to Modify Schedule, and finding good cause therefor, the Court hereby APPROVES the stipulation and ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff withdraws her Motion to Remand [Doc. # 13], the July 11, 2025 hearing on the Motion to Remand is VACATED, and the action shall therefore remain in this Court;! 2. Defendants shall file a response (by answer or motion), reserving all defenses, except improper service of process and improper venue, to Plaintiff's Complaint by no later than July 25, 2025; and 3. In accordance with the Parties’ stipulation, Defendants shall not be permitted to file a motion to transfer or change venue. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 24, 2025 eet. Fr. F<. DOLLY M. GEE Chief United States District Judge Because the parties cannot stipulate to subject matter jurisdiction in federal court, this Court has independently reviewed the basis for jurisdiction and is satisfied that jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1333. See Gruver v. Lesman Fisheries, Inc., 489 F.3d 978, 982 (9th Cir. 2007); Taghadomi v. United States, 401 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2005). ]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grace O Marcaigh v. Christian Combs (Grace O Marcaigh v. Christian Combs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.