FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Admiralty, maritime and prize cases
28 U.S.C. § 1333
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1333 (Admiralty, maritime and prize cases) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1333.
Text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1)Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.
(2)Any prize brought into the United States and all proceedings for the condemnation of property taken as prize.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lake Tankers Corp. v. Henn
354 U.S. 147 (Supreme Court, 1957)
U. S. Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Arguelles
400 U.S. 351 (Supreme Court, 1971)
Complaint of Consolidation Coal Company, as Owner of the Motor Vessel Elizabeth and as Charterer of Barge Number Mc 1029, for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability. George Newman
123 F.3d 126 (Third Circuit, 1997)
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. BP P.L.C.
31 F.4th 178 (Fourth Circuit, 2022)
In the Matter of the Complaint of McCarthy Brothers Company/clark Bridge, as Owner Pro Hac Vice of Barge No. Aeb1 for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability
83 F.3d 821 (Seventh Circuit, 1996)
Alfred J. Ghezzi, Jr. v. Foss Launch and Tug Company
321 F.2d 421 (Ninth Circuit, 1963)
Sunbelt Corp. v. Noble, Denton & Associates, Inc.
5 F.3d 28 (Third Circuit, 1993)
De La Rosa v. St Charles Gaming Co
474 F.3d 185 (Fifth Circuit, 2006)
Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. Mackie
949 F.2d 818 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
Bickel v. Korean Air Lines Company, Ltd.
83 F.3d 127 (Sixth Circuit, 1996)
In re Tetra Applied Technologies L P
362 F.3d 338 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
Mullenix v. United States
984 F.2d 101 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)
Acceptance Ins. Co. v. SDC, INC.
952 F. Supp. 644 (E.D. Missouri, 1997)
Gavigan v. Celebrity Cruises Inc.
843 F. Supp. 2d 1254 (S.D. Florida, 2011)
Rederi A/B Soya v. Ss Grand Grace
369 F.2d 159 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
RADIOMARINE CORPORATION v. Gulf Northern Co., Inc.
394 F. Supp. 381 (E.D. Missouri, 1975)
Rollin v. Kimberly Clark Tissue Co.
211 F.R.D. 670 (S.D. Alabama, 2001)
Jones Stevedoring Company, a Corporation v. Nippo Kisen Company, Ltd., a Corporation, Nippo Kisen Company, Ltd., a Corporation v. Stockton Bulk Terminal Company of California, Inc., a Corporation
419 F.2d 143 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Great Am. Ins. Co.
(Second Circuit, 2016)
Blue Water Marine Services v. M/Y Natalita III
(Eleventh Circuit, 2008)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §79, 63 Stat. 101.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(3) and 371 (3), (4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 3, 256, pars. 3, 4, 36 Stat. 1091, 1160; Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 97, §§1, 2, 40 Stat. 395; June 10, 1922, ch. 216, §§1, 2, 42 Stat. 634).
Section consolidates certain provisions of sections 41(3), 371(3) and 371(4) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of sections 41(3) and 371(4), relating to seizures, are incorporated in section 1356 of this title. (See reviser's note thereunder.)
The "saving to suitors" clause in sections 41(3) and 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler and more expressive of the original intent of Congress and is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolishing the distinction between law and equity.
Provisions of section 41(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., based on the 1917 and 1922 amendments, relating to remedies under State workmen's compensation laws, were deleted. Such amendments were held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. (See Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 1920, 40 S.Ct. 438, 253 U.S. 149, 64 L.Ed. 834, and State of Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co., 1924, 44 S.Ct. 302, 264 U.S. 219, 68 L.Ed. 646.)
Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases.
Changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
This section amends section 1333(a)(1) of title 28, U.S.C., by substituting "suitors" for "libellant or petitioner" to conform to the language of the law in existence at the time of the enactment of the revision of title 28.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1949—Subd. (1). Act May 24, 1949, substituted "suitors" for "libellant or petitioner".
1948 Act
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§41(3) and 371 (3), (4) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§24, par. 3, 256, pars. 3, 4, 36 Stat. 1091, 1160; Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 97, §§1, 2, 40 Stat. 395; June 10, 1922, ch. 216, §§1, 2, 42 Stat. 634).
Section consolidates certain provisions of sections 41(3), 371(3) and 371(4) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Other provisions of sections 41(3) and 371(4), relating to seizures, are incorporated in section 1356 of this title. (See reviser's note thereunder.)
The "saving to suitors" clause in sections 41(3) and 371(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was changed by substituting the words "any other remedy to which he is otherwise entitled" for the words "the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it." The substituted language is simpler and more expressive of the original intent of Congress and is in conformity with Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure abolishing the distinction between law and equity.
Provisions of section 41(3) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., based on the 1917 and 1922 amendments, relating to remedies under State workmen's compensation laws, were deleted. Such amendments were held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. (See Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 1920, 40 S.Ct. 438, 253 U.S. 149, 64 L.Ed. 834, and State of Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co., 1924, 44 S.Ct. 302, 264 U.S. 219, 68 L.Ed. 646.)
Words "libellant or petitioner" were substituted for "suitors" to describe moving party in admiralty cases.
Changes were made in phraseology.
1949 Act
This section amends section 1333(a)(1) of title 28, U.S.C., by substituting "suitors" for "libellant or petitioner" to conform to the language of the law in existence at the time of the enactment of the revision of title 28.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1949—Subd. (1). Act May 24, 1949, substituted "suitors" for "libellant or petitioner".
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1333.