Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

149 So. 3d 1282, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1409, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2332, 2014 WL 4853661

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 1, 2014

DocketNos. 13-1409, 14-433

StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 1282 (Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grabowski v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 149 So. 3d 1282, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1409, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2332, 2014 WL 4853661 (La. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PICKETT, Judge.

|, For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, Ed Grabowski, et ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., 14-433 c/w 13-1409, (La.App. 3 Cir.10/1/14), 149 So.3d 899, the writ application is denied. The judgment of the trial court granting the Motion to Close the Record is affirmed. The grants of summary judgment in favor of Smith & Nephew, Inc., PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest are reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs of the writ application are assessed to the Grabowskis. Costs of the appeal are assessed to Smith & Nephew, Inc. PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest.

WRIT DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PICKETT, Judge.

|, For the reasons set forth in the companion case hereto, Ed Grabowski, et ux. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., 14-433 c/w 13-1409, (La.App. 3 Cir.10/1/14), 149 So.3d 899, the writ application is denied. The judgment of the trial court granting the Motion to Close the Record is affirmed. The grants of summary judgment in favor of Smith & Nephew, Inc., PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest are reversed, and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs of the writ application are assessed to the Grabowskis. Costs of the appeal are assessed to Smith & Nephew, Inc. PUREPLAY Orthopaedic Sales 1 Ltd., and Daniel Forrest.

WRIT DENIED. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 So. 3d 1282, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1409, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2332, 2014 WL 4853661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grabowski-v-smith-nephew-inc-lactapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack