Gowens v. . Alamance County

197 S.E. 538, 214 N.C. 18, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 248
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 15, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 197 S.E. 538 (Gowens v. . Alamance County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gowens v. . Alamance County, 197 S.E. 538, 214 N.C. 18, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 248 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

WiNBORNE, J.

The record on appeal discloses these facts: Lawrence Gowens died in July, 1936, as the result of a gunshot wound inflicted by a person whom he was trying to arrest. At the time of his injury and death Gowens was employed by Alamance County in the capacity of jailer, with duties pertaining to such position. He was also deputy sheriff, under the defendant sheriff of Alamance County, with duties generally performed by deputies sheriffs. The defendants, Alamance County and sheriff of Alamance County, each carried a policy of compensation insurance with defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company to cover compensation liability.

The findings of fact, conclusion of law and award of the Commissioner who heard the case were adopted by the Full Commission and affirmed on appeal to the Superior Court. Among others, the Commissioner makes this finding: “We are of the opinion, under all the evidence, that the deceased, either as a deputy sheriff or as jailer, or in the dual capacity of deputy sheriff jailer, suffered an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment resulting in his death.” Upon the facts of this case, this finding is insufficient to support an award. The finding must be specific. For proper determination of this controversy it is necessary that there be a finding of fact on this question: Did Lawrence Gowens suffer injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as jailer? The cause will be remanded to the end that such finding of fact may be made and further proceeding had upon that basis.

Eemanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brice v. Robertson House Moving, Wrecking & Salvage Co.
105 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Brice v. ROBERTSON HOUSE MOVING, WRECKING & S. CO.
105 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1958)
Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal Company
85 S.E.2d 596 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Thomason v. Red Bird Cab Co.
70 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Zucchi's Case
37 N.E.2d 514 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Cloninger v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery Co.
9 S.E.2d 511 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Gowens v. . Alamance County
3 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E. 538, 214 N.C. 18, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gowens-v-alamance-county-nc-1938.