Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.
Opinion
[J-96-2013] [MO: Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, STEVENS, JJ.
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 10 MAP 2013 OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR : : Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth : Court at No. 376 MD 2012 dated January 23, v. : 2013. : : ARGUED: November 20, 2013 SEAN DONAHUE AND THE OFFICE OF : OPEN RECORDS : :
APPEAL OF: OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS
CONCURRING OPINION
MR. JUSTICE STEVENS DECIDED: August 18, 2014 I join the majority in its entirety. I write separately, however, to reaffirm my
support of the importance of the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL).1 This body of law plays a
fundamental, significant role in the administration of Pennsylvania government and
promotes broad transparency between the public and its government officials. By
allowing access to official government records that the public would ordinarily be unable
to obtain, the RTKL gives the public the power to prohibit secrets, scrutinize the acts of
public officials, and make those officials accountable for their use of public funds.
Coulter v. Dept. of Public Welfare, 65 A.3d 1085 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2013); Buehl v.
1 65 P.S. § 67.101 et. seq. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections, 955 A.2d 488 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2008). Thus, the RTKL
is an invaluable tool in our state government.
[J-96-2013] - 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt. (Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.