Gov Guam v. Torres & O'Keefe
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM
T OF (U A?tM,
Plaintiff,
DECISION AND ORDER
J } D E L I N
ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY
s a s CO- COUNSEL OF THE:
ii E `I.UE OF JOSE MIARTINEZ TATE OF JOSE; )
m d a n t s.
IN TRO D UCTIO N
ne before the Honorable Alberto C. Lamorena III on IXrceembe .o Disqualif y Counsel . Assistant Attorr lischoff appeared on behalf of the Government of Guam, Attorney Josrefrli :,resented the Estate of Jose Martinez Torres. Following the heori ok the ma tter u n der a dvis ement. Having consider ed the par ties applicable law, this Court now issues its Decision and Order.
DISCUSSIO N
3, Defendant filed a Motion to Disqu< hi s violation o f t h e G u a m Rules o ssional Condtua�
w=arran ic ation. A hearing wa s held on the matter on December `30, I
201:3 and the moti t a k e n u n d e r a d vi s e me n t . T hi s U ou rt t ake r
tM x,presents the Government as he is no ant, Attorney General based on facts contained in a February Iii, 203 e ,ion a nd O r d e r i n CV11 24- 09, issued b y t h e Honorable A r t h u r R.
the, facts contain the finding c fv 'Mr. Bischoff is rendered mo
CONCLUSION
The motion is hereby DENIED for mootness and for April 28, 2014 at ',
SO O RDERED this I ith dray of
JORE' A
-------------------------------------------------~~~~~···~
512/lViCE VJA Box ViA COURT BOX
uc-knowl<.Yf£e th.:1t t ec4cnouttaxtye copy o f the that a copy
ongl nal he origir:al mto wax hueto was pl ace d in the placed
~~) t~
Court box of . t _,,.^
CAG&I t 't . '"". ;. s'1i J - f.
.()I
Date: 'II; lb;,~~~~ ~>()
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gov Guam v. Torres & O'Keefe (Gov Guam v. Torres & O'Keefe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.