Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst
101 S.E.2d 203, 96 Ga. App. 742, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 679
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 Ga. App. 48 →
Opinion
The Supreme Court of Georgia in Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst, 213 Ga. 682 (100 S. E. 2d 881) having reversed the judgment of this court in Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst, 96 Ga. App. 48 (99 S. E. 2d 475), the judgment of affirmance originally rendered by this court is hereby vacated, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed in conformance to the rulings and judgment of the Supreme Court.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst, 101 S.E.2d 203, 96 Ga. App. 742, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 679 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).
101 S.E.2d 203 (Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst
100 S.E.2d 881 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Gouldman-Taber Pontiac, Inc. v. Zerbst
99 S.E.2d 475 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)