Gould v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2008·No. 08-1007·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1007

THEODORE B. GOULD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOSEPH DELEON; RICHARD L. GRUBAUGH; BARBARA PETROHOVICH; WILLIAM MARTIN; CHARLES PINE; ANN M. WELHAF; AND OTHERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00008-nkm)

Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore B. Gould, Appellant Pro Se. Ivan C. Dale, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Theodore B. Gould appeals from the district court’s

orders: (1) dismissing his complaint in which he alleged

conspiracy and fraud and sought a refund of taxes and compensatory

damages, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of the

order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Gould v. United States, No. 3:06-00008-nkm (W.D. Va.

Aug. 9 & Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gould v. United States, (4th Cir. 2008).

Gould v. United States (Gould v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.