Gould v. United States
This text of Gould v. United States (Gould v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1007
THEODORE B. GOULD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; JOSEPH DELEON; RICHARD L. GRUBAUGH; BARBARA PETROHOVICH; WILLIAM MARTIN; CHARLES PINE; ANN M. WELHAF; AND OTHERS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:06-cv-00008-nkm)
Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 4, 2008
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theodore B. Gould, Appellant Pro Se. Ivan C. Dale, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Theodore B. Gould appeals from the district court’s
orders: (1) dismissing his complaint in which he alleged
conspiracy and fraud and sought a refund of taxes and compensatory
damages, and (2) denying his motion for reconsideration of the
order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Gould v. United States, No. 3:06-00008-nkm (W.D. Va.
Aug. 9 & Oct. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gould v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-united-states-ca4-2008.