Gould v. Theresa Grotta Center
This text of 214 A.2d 537 (Gould v. Theresa Grotta Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
LILLIAN GOULD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THERESA GROTTA CENTER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEONARD.
Mr. Harold I. Braff argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Braff, Litvak & Ertag, attorneys).
Mr. Edward V. Ryan argued the cause for respondent (Mr. William J. Gannon, on the brief).
*254 PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in the Law Division by Judge Whipple, Gould v. Theresa Grotta Center, 83 N.J. Super. 169 (Law Div. 1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 A.2d 537, 89 N.J. Super. 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-theresa-grotta-center-njsuperctappdiv-1965.