Gould v. State

255 S.W. 1118, 96 Tex. Crim. 100, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gould v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 18
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 1923·No. No. 7257.·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The The appeal is from a judgment making final the judgment nisi forfeiting an appeal bond.

*101 This is a companion case to Gould et al. v. State, No. 7256, reported in 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 18, 252 S. W. Rep., 772, and to Gould et al. v. State, No. 7258, recently decided but not yet reported.

The facts of the cases are so nearly identical that the legal questions are the same. The companion cases were affirmed. Upon the authority of them, a similar disposition is made of the present appeal.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gould v. State, 255 S.W. 1118, 96 Tex. Crim. 100, 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 791 (Tex. 1923).

255 S.W. 1118 (Gould v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gould v. State
252 S.W. 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)