Gould v. State

254 S.W. 982, 95 Tex. Crim. 502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gould v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Tex. Crim. 18
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 1923·No. No. 7258.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

— This is an appeal from final judgment upon a forfeited bail bond in the sum of one thousand dollars, against R. G. Gould as principal and Otto Lang and P. W. Gifford as sureties.

The facts are identical with those stated in cause No. 7256 in this court wherein the same parties are involved and reported in 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 18, 252 S. W. Rep., 772, with the exception that the number of the case in the lower court in which the present forfeiture was taken is No. 1497, and the bail bond involved was made in cause No. 210 on the docket of the Justice of the Peace.

The legal questions are identical. On the authority of Gould, et al. v. State, (supra) this judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gould v. State, 254 S.W. 982, 95 Tex. Crim. 502 (Tex. 1923).

254 S.W. 982 (Gould v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gould v. State
252 S.W. 772 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1923)