Gould v. Mellick & Sexton
789 A.2d 990, 259 Conn. 902, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 555
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 20, 2001
DocketSC 16659
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 789 A.2d 990 (Gould v. Mellick & Sexton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gould v. Mellick & Sexton, 789 A.2d 990, 259 Conn. 902, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 555 (Colo. 2001).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 542 (AC 20228/ AC 20230), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked authority to render summary judgment because: (1) the case was complex; and (2) there were disputed questions of facts?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gould v. Mellick & Sexton
819 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.
815 A.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Rytman, No. X01 Cv 87 0159941s (Aug. 20, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 10730 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
McCoy v. Roche, No. X01 Cv 00 0168694s (May 28, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 6902 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
789 A.2d 990, 259 Conn. 902, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-mellick-sexton-conn-2001.