Gould v. Mellick & Sexton
789 A.2d 990, 259 Conn. 902, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 555
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 542 (AC 20228/ AC 20230), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked authority to render summary judgment because: (1) the case was complex; and (2) there were disputed questions of facts?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gould v. Mellick & Sexton, 789 A.2d 990, 259 Conn. 902, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 555 (Colo. 2001).
789 A.2d 990 (Gould v. Mellick & Sexton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gould v. Mellick & Sexton
819 A.2d 216 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Pelletier v. Sordoni/Skanska Construction Co.
815 A.2d 82 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Rytman, No. X01 Cv 87 0159941s (Aug. 20, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 10730 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)
McCoy v. Roche, No. X01 Cv 00 0168694s (May 28, 2002)
2002 Conn. Super. Ct. 6902 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2002)