Gouda v. DETROIT-MACOMB HOSPITALS ASSOCIATION
This text of 217 N.W.2d 905 (Gouda v. DETROIT-MACOMB HOSPITALS ASSOCIATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
By this action, plaintiff sought reinstatement to the medical staff of South Macomb Hospital and money damages allegedly arising from his demotion and later suspension from that staff. After a lengthy trial before the court, without a jury, the trial judge filed extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law as the basis for a judgment in favor of defendants. That judgment entered and plaintiff was assessed $12,000 attorney fees as part of the taxed costs. Plaintiff appeals.
Record review discloses evidentiary support for the trial court’s findings of fact. These findings of fact support the conclusions of law. We find no procedural errors that require reversal. The judgment in favor of defendants is affirmed.
Until granted further authority, a trial court is bound by existing court rules and statutes in [518]*518awarding attorney fees, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co v Allen, 50 Mich App 71; 212 NW2d 821 (1973). There is no statute or court rule authorizing the contested award of attorney fees in this case.
Affirmed except as to the award of attorney fees. That award is reversed and remanded for taxation of attorney fees pursuant to applicable statutes and court rules. Defendants may recover costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
217 N.W.2d 905, 52 Mich. App. 516, 1974 Mich. App. LEXIS 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gouda-v-detroit-macomb-hospitals-association-michctapp-1974.